MSI Gaming Geforce RTX 4060 Ti 16Gb Gdrr6 Boost Clock: 2625 Mhz 128-Bit Hdmi/Dp Nvlink Torx Fan 4.0 Ada Lovelace Architecture Graphics Card (RTX…
Chipset: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Video Memory: 16GB GDDR6
Boost Clock: 2625 MHz
Memory Interface: 128-bit
Output: DisplayPort x 3 (v1.4a) / HDMI 2.1a x 1
Specification: MSI Gaming Geforce RTX 4060 Ti 16Gb Gdrr6 Boost Clock: 2625 Mhz 128-Bit Hdmi/Dp Nvlink Torx Fan 4.0 Ada Lovelace Architecture Graphics Card (RTX…
Brand
MSI
Graphics Coprocessor
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Series
RTX 4060 Ti VENTUS 2X BLACK 16G OC
Item Height
4.72 Inches
Item Width
1.65 Inches
Product Dimensions
19.89 x 4.19 x 11.99 cm, 815 g
Item model number
GeForceRTX4060TiVENTUS2XBLACK16GOC
Memory Clock Speed
2625 MHz
Manufacturer
MSI
Graphics Card Description
Dedicated
Graphics Chipset Brand
NVIDIA
Graphics RAM Type
GDDR6
Graphics Card Ram Size
16 GB
Graphics Card Interface
PCI-Express x16
Are Batteries Included
No
Included Components
Graphics card, quick setup guide
Country of Origin
China
Item Weight
815 g
5 reviews for MSI Gaming Geforce RTX 4060 Ti 16Gb Gdrr6 Boost Clock: 2625 Mhz 128-Bit Hdmi/Dp Nvlink Torx Fan 4.0 Ada Lovelace Architecture Graphics Card (RTX…
4.8out of 5
★★★★★
★★★★★
4
★★★★★
1
★★★★★
0
★★★★★
0
★★★★★
0
Write a review
Show allMost HelpfulHighest RatingLowest Rating
★★★★★
YH –
I upgraded from a 3060 to this 4060ti, which most would probably say is not the best choice because of cost to value. However, under the limitations I was working with, this was an excellent buy. The power usage is low, even lower than the 3060 based on my research (I’m also only using a 500W PSU despite both the 3060 and 4060 recommending a 550W PSU – granted, my CPU is a weaker model that draws only fairly low power – though this 4060ti is still the bottleneck for the games I play, despite my CPU being “mid”). Compared to the 3060, the heat generation is much lower as well. In terms of performance, I would recommend a quick Google of other people’s benchmarks, but I would say my experience with the games I play is pretty accurate when compared to the benchmarks people have posted online.
Helpful(0)Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
★★★★★
Amazon Customer –
I am using the RTX4060 TI 16GB in an Intel NUC9 (NUC9VXQNB) to edit videos with DaVinci Resolve. The Intel NUC is a small formfactor PC that allows GPUs with a maximum length of 20cm – i.e. the choice of GPUs that fit inside is severely limited.
After increasing the resolution/bitrate of my video clips, my computer and my old GPU (RTX 3060 12GB) were struggling playing back videos fluently and I decided to upgrade. The goal was to find a GPU that was faster and had more GPU memory (DaVinci crashes if GPU memory gets low).
Conventional wisdom in the computer hardware newsgroups is that the RTX4060 TI is not a good upgrade from an RTX 3060 but I bit the bullet and ordered the card. For my use case (video editing), the new GPU is 12-34% faster than the old one.
In the tests mentioned below, I used high resolution video clips with roughly 200 Mb/s bitrate. Each clip was stabilized in real-time with Gyroflow and two LUTs were applied for color correction. Most of the clips had some form of light noise reduction and some clips had heavy (spatial + temporal) noise reduction applied. Videos exported in 1080P used a 1080P timeline and videos exported in 4K were using a 4K timeline. My computer was running Windows 11 with the latest NVidia drivers.
A typical mix of video clips exported in 1080P: RTX3060: 6:45min RTX4060TI: 4:58min (26% speedup)
A typical mix of video clips exported in 4K: RTX3060: 12:35min RTX4060TI: 11:01min (12% speedup)
Video clips with heavy noise reduction exported in 1080P: RTX3060: 13:34min RTX4060TI: 8:50min (34% speedup)
Video clips with heavy noise reduction exported in 4K: RTX3060: RTX4060TI: no crash/video got exported.
In summary: the speedup is not as much as I was hoping for but due to the space constraints of my Intel NUC, I decided to keep the card. Is this card worth the money? Probably not … but in my case it makes the video editing process more pleasant.
Helpful(0)Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
★★★★★
Amazon Customer –
I upgraded from the 3060 ti to this new card. It is working flawlessly and performs great for 1080p gaming
Helpful(0)Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
★★★★★
Joseph R. –
This card is a pleasant surprise. Excellence in such a small form factor. Fits perfectly in an 8L small form factor case.
Helpful(0)Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
★★★★★
Marquis –
For the people with constraints on the power supply, this RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) provides the best performance. Most people may choose RTX 4070 for even better performance, or RTX 3060/4060 for better value. However, in my case, my HP Envy desktop came with 310W HP-customized PSU, and the most powerful PSU I could upgrade to was 500W as the motherboard and the chassis don’t take standard PSU. RTX 4070 is recommended to have 650W PSU, while 4060 Ti is recommended to have 500-550W PSU, so RTX 4060Ti is the most powerful candidate that I could try. The benchmark scores didn’t disappoint me. I got 26541 in Passmark. As comparison, the average score of 4060 Ti is 22565, average RTX 4070 is 26841, average RTX 3080 is 25354. The OC frequency I observed in Afterburner is 2775 MHz (much higher than the 2626 MHz claimed in the title), and it stays at this frequency very stably for long time. The power consumption during gaming also stays at 160-165W very stably, and it could go lower if you turn on V-Sync and set refresh rate to 60fps. In idle mode, the power consumption is between 10-13W and the fans stop spinning. As a conclusion, I believe the higher OC frequency brings the Passmark score to be on par with RTX 4070 and even slightly exceeds RTX 3080, although I guess in the real games, probably it is still going to be a little behind those 70/80-class cards, but not too much.
Update Jan’24: I’am getting 90fps on the highest quality settings on 4K resolution of Baldur’s Gate 3 (with DLSS on). I tried both dx11 and Vulcan, similar FPS but with VSync the Vulkan gets lower GPU load (60%) on 60 Hz, which reduces the power consumption and fan noise significantly. Very impressive! By the way, sometimes the GPU Memory usage reaches 9GB+ on Volkan. On Total War Warhammer II 4K resolution benchmarks, I got 60.7 fps on High settings and 50.8 fps on Ultra settings.
YH –
I upgraded from a 3060 to this 4060ti, which most would probably say is not the best choice because of cost to value. However, under the limitations I was working with, this was an excellent buy. The power usage is low, even lower than the 3060 based on my research (I’m also only using a 500W PSU despite both the 3060 and 4060 recommending a 550W PSU – granted, my CPU is a weaker model that draws only fairly low power – though this 4060ti is still the bottleneck for the games I play, despite my CPU being “mid”). Compared to the 3060, the heat generation is much lower as well. In terms of performance, I would recommend a quick Google of other people’s benchmarks, but I would say my experience with the games I play is pretty accurate when compared to the benchmarks people have posted online.
Amazon Customer –
I am using the RTX4060 TI 16GB in an Intel NUC9 (NUC9VXQNB) to edit videos with DaVinci Resolve. The Intel NUC is a small formfactor PC that allows GPUs with a maximum length of 20cm – i.e. the choice of GPUs that fit inside is severely limited.
After increasing the resolution/bitrate of my video clips, my computer and my old GPU (RTX 3060 12GB) were struggling playing back videos fluently and I decided to upgrade. The goal was to find a GPU that was faster and had more GPU memory (DaVinci crashes if GPU memory gets low).
Conventional wisdom in the computer hardware newsgroups is that the RTX4060 TI is not a good upgrade from an RTX 3060 but I bit the bullet and ordered the card. For my use case (video editing), the new GPU is 12-34% faster than the old one.
In the tests mentioned below, I used high resolution video clips with roughly 200 Mb/s bitrate. Each clip was stabilized in real-time with Gyroflow and two LUTs were applied for color correction. Most of the clips had some form of light noise reduction and some clips had heavy (spatial + temporal) noise reduction applied. Videos exported in 1080P used a 1080P timeline and videos exported in 4K were using a 4K timeline. My computer was running Windows 11 with the latest NVidia drivers.
A typical mix of video clips exported in 1080P:
RTX3060: 6:45min RTX4060TI: 4:58min (26% speedup)
A typical mix of video clips exported in 4K:
RTX3060: 12:35min RTX4060TI: 11:01min (12% speedup)
Video clips with heavy noise reduction exported in 1080P:
RTX3060: 13:34min RTX4060TI: 8:50min (34% speedup)
Video clips with heavy noise reduction exported in 4K:
RTX3060: RTX4060TI: no crash/video got exported.
In summary: the speedup is not as much as I was hoping for but due to the space constraints of my Intel NUC, I decided to keep the card. Is this card worth the money? Probably not … but in my case it makes the video editing process more pleasant.
Amazon Customer –
I upgraded from the 3060 ti to this new card. It is working flawlessly and performs great for 1080p gaming
Joseph R. –
This card is a pleasant surprise. Excellence in such a small form factor. Fits perfectly in an 8L small form factor case.
Marquis –
For the people with constraints on the power supply, this RTX 4060 Ti (16GB) provides the best performance. Most people may choose RTX 4070 for even better performance, or RTX 3060/4060 for better value. However, in my case, my HP Envy desktop came with 310W HP-customized PSU, and the most powerful PSU I could upgrade to was 500W as the motherboard and the chassis don’t take standard PSU. RTX 4070 is recommended to have 650W PSU, while 4060 Ti is recommended to have 500-550W PSU, so RTX 4060Ti is the most powerful candidate that I could try.
The benchmark scores didn’t disappoint me. I got 26541 in Passmark. As comparison, the average score of 4060 Ti is 22565, average RTX 4070 is 26841, average RTX 3080 is 25354. The OC frequency I observed in Afterburner is 2775 MHz (much higher than the 2626 MHz claimed in the title), and it stays at this frequency very stably for long time. The power consumption during gaming also stays at 160-165W very stably, and it could go lower if you turn on V-Sync and set refresh rate to 60fps. In idle mode, the power consumption is between 10-13W and the fans stop spinning.
As a conclusion, I believe the higher OC frequency brings the Passmark score to be on par with RTX 4070 and even slightly exceeds RTX 3080, although I guess in the real games, probably it is still going to be a little behind those 70/80-class cards, but not too much.
Update Jan’24: I’am getting 90fps on the highest quality settings on 4K resolution of Baldur’s Gate 3 (with DLSS on). I tried both dx11 and Vulcan, similar FPS but with VSync the Vulkan gets lower GPU load (60%) on 60 Hz, which reduces the power consumption and fan noise significantly. Very impressive! By the way, sometimes the GPU Memory usage reaches 9GB+ on Volkan.
On Total War Warhammer II 4K resolution benchmarks, I got 60.7 fps on High settings and 50.8 fps on Ultra settings.